Summary
¥Several methods available
Annual (or seasonal extremes), r-largest, POT, simple indices
¥EV distributions can be fitted by moments, l-moments, mle
Latter also allows inclusion of covariates (e.g., time)
¥Should evaluate
Feasibility
Stationarity assumption
Goodness-of-fit, etc
¥Data limitations
quality, availability, continuity, etc
suitability for climate model assessment
¥R-largest and POT methods use data more efficiently
Do need to be more careful about assumptions
Data may not be readily available for widespread use
¥Formal climate change detection studies on extremes beginning to appear despite challenges É
¥Also attempting to estimate FAR (Fraction of Attributable Risk) in the case of Òone-ofÓ events
How does one pose the question and avoid selection bias?